http://veryeasyfinancialservices.com/uncategorized/internet-banking-matters-to-fact/ Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:21:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://veryeasyfinancialservices.com/uncategorized/internet-banking-matters-to-fact/comment-page-1/#comment-44 VICTOR H Sun, 31 May 2009 22:31:59 +0000 http://www.veryeasyfinancialservices.com/banking-services/internet-banking-matters-to-fact#comment-44 how many more times do you plan on posting this question ? this question would serve you better if posted in the "LEGAL" section. but i recommend posting only once.<br><b>References : </b><br> how many more times do you plan on posting this question ?
this question would serve you better if posted in the "LEGAL" section. but i recommend posting only once.
References :

]]> http://veryeasyfinancialservices.com/uncategorized/internet-banking-matters-to-fact/comment-page-1/#comment-43 unclebutch Sun, 31 May 2009 22:29:59 +0000 http://www.veryeasyfinancialservices.com/banking-services/internet-banking-matters-to-fact#comment-43 what? i'm just glad the thing works.<br><b>References : </b><br>life what? i'm just glad the thing works.
References :
life

]]> http://veryeasyfinancialservices.com/uncategorized/internet-banking-matters-to-fact/comment-page-1/#comment-42 jnbanunule@yahoo.com Sun, 31 May 2009 17:27:26 +0000 http://www.veryeasyfinancialservices.com/banking-services/internet-banking-matters-to-fact#comment-42 <b>Is all internet representation misrepresentation which requires legal action? jnbanunule@yahoo.com?</b><br>I revised the UK Misrepresentation Act as well as the Definition of LORD Hershell who defined fraudulent misrepresentation as a false statement made knowingly or without belief in its truth or reckless/carelessly not minding its truth or falsehood. A person is not condemned for fraud if he honestly believed his words to be true. THEN Professor Ewan McKendrick defined the representation as a statement of fact inducing him/her to enter the contract/deal. The representation will be misrepresentation if it is false and misleads the party to whom it is addressed or if it is false and misleads the party who relied on it if it was known that this party would rely on it. Stating a false present intention/policy or falsified by later development becomes a misrepresentation’s statement of law or opinion is not a statement of fact. I even revised the civil suit presided by Hon. Justice L.Bowen in the matter Commercial banking………versus…….R.H.Grown; 1972 -2LI R360 The defendant bank made a statement about the plaintiff’s customer to the plaintiff’s bank .the statement misrepresented the financial standing of the customer for misrepresentation {The defendant was held liable in the ruling of LORD Bowen} That’s where my question from Thanks for you good answers Jonathan Bruce Muwanguzi Is all internet representation misrepresentation which requires legal action? jnbanunule@yahoo.com?
I revised the UK Misrepresentation Act as well as the Definition of LORD Hershell who defined fraudulent misrepresentation as a false statement made knowingly or without belief in its truth or reckless/carelessly not minding its truth or falsehood. A person is not condemned for fraud if he honestly believed his words to be true.
THEN Professor Ewan McKendrick defined the representation as a statement of fact inducing him/her to enter the contract/deal. The representation will be misrepresentation if it is false and misleads the party to whom it is addressed or if it is false and misleads the party who relied on it if it was known that this party would rely on it. Stating a false present intention/policy or falsified by later development becomes a misrepresentation’s statement of law or opinion is not a statement of fact.
I even revised the civil suit presided by Hon. Justice L.Bowen in the matter
Commercial banking………versus…….R.H.Grown; 1972 -2LI R360
The defendant bank made a statement about the plaintiff’s customer to the plaintiff’s bank .the statement misrepresented the financial standing of the customer for misrepresentation
{The defendant was held liable in the ruling of LORD Bowen}
That’s where my question from
Thanks for you good answers
Jonathan Bruce Muwanguzi

]]>